Working software gets a claim. Wishful thinking gets a label.
This site distinguishes implemented product capabilities from illustrative interface examples and verified customer results. Because 'AI-powered' is not a substitute for evidence.
Four labels. No interpretive dance.
Product behavior and business results are different claims. We keep them different because the alternative is how software marketing becomes fan fiction.
Present in current product source with API/UI or runtime contracts and automated checks.
Does not by itself prove public availability or customer outcomes.
A fictional interface, organization, or value used to explain implemented behavior.
Not a real customer, forecast, testimonial, or performance result.
Implemented behind explicit environment, budget, permission, or activation controls.
Not production availability. Market Foresight is currently described this way.
A dated, approved record identifies source, method, scope, and measured period.
Does not generalize beyond that scope.
Even AI advice gets reviewed.
Illustrative Evidence Integrity view grounded in the implemented review model.
Evidence IntegrityOne claim is getting stale. Another disagrees.
Advisory score. No source was changed.
Delivery capacity
Two current records disagree about available implementation capacity.
Sources · HRIS snapshot · delivery planCustomer timing
The latest confirmed timeline is 94 days old.
Next-best evidence · executive confirmationWhat can’t your company answer today?
Bring one decision that crosses customers, work, money, market, risk, or value. We’ll show you how Signalz connects it—and be honest about what it cannot know yet.
Ask us the hard question ↗